Friday, November 15, 2013

Thinking Economically: The Texas PUC and ObamaCare

Musings on Economic Freedom from the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s

Center for Economic Freedom

 

The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) will meet this morning as it continues its efforts to impose ObamaCare-style regulation on the Texas electricity market.

 

This may be surprising news to the average Texan, who might generally associate government control over entire sectors of the economy and large tax increases with California, New York, and Washington, D.C.

 

But it is happening right here in Texas before our very eyes.

 

While the details are still to be worked out, in a nutshell the PUC’s idea is to re-regulate Texas’ competitive electricity market by replacing it with a capacity market. The capacity market would pay generating companies for their generating plants on top of any electricity consumers purchased. These capacity payments, or corporate subsidies, would be paid for by a $4 billion or so annual electricity tax on Texas consumers.

 

What does this mean? Here are some of the impacts:

  • Consumer choice: greatly reduced
  • Prices: increased
  • Risk: shifted from generators to consumers
  • Taxes on residential electricity bills: increased, by $150 or more per year
  • Competition: greatly reduced

It doesn’t have to be this way. A majority of the PUC’s commissioners, appointed by the governor, have announced their support for a capacity market out of the mistaken belief we are running out of electricity. But this simply isn’t the case.

 

Texas’ electricity market is the most competitive, successful electricity market in the world. No state or nation can compare. It has supplied with us more than adequate supplies of electricity to make it through the hottest days of summer for several years to come.

 

One simple way to see this is that electricity prices today are low; and low prices are indicative of the fact that supplies exceed demand. As demand starts to increase relative to demand, prices will increase. Those higher prices will then generate new investment in generation to power our future electricity needs. That’s the way a market works, and how it is working in Texas.

 

The myth that Texas is running out of electricity is fueled by three things:

  • Generators’ claims that they can’t turn a profit
  • Inaccurate forecasts of future reserves
  • Studies by consultants claiming the free market won’t work when it comes to electricity

Our research has debunked the claim that generators generally cannot turn a profit. Of course, there may be some generators that may not be able to do so. But that happens every day in every market. There is no reason that consumers should be asked to guarantee revenue for generators. But that is what would happen under a capacity market.

 

We’ve also shown that official projections of future shortages are based on inaccurate methodology. Past forecasts have overstated future demand and understated future supply. There is no reason to believe that current forecasts are any different. In fact, the methodology is undergoing revision at this very moment, and the upcoming December forecast is expected to show higher future reserves. Why can’t the PUC wait to see the updated forecast before taking the extraordinary step of regulating a major sector of the Texas economy?

 

This brings me to my last point. The entire effort to impose a capacity market on Texans is ultimately based on the belief that free markets do not work. That belief is essentially what a study commissioned by the PUC last year was based on when it claimed that future reserves would fall below 10 percent.

 

Never mind that past reserves have never dipped that low. Never mind that reserves would still be well above expected demand. Never mind that generators have poured tens of billions of dollars into new generation in Texas.

 

The same message is also being sent by the generators and the regulators at the PUC, “If you do not want to run out of electricity, you better let us handle it.”

 

Yet, are we really to believe in the midst of the ObamaCare debacle that centralized, government control of the economy is the way to solve our economic problems?

 

Government control of the real estate market led to the Great Recession. Here in Texas, government control of the banking industry in the 1980s led to the collapse of the Texas economy and the savings and loan crises. A government takeover of the economy will never solve our problems.

 

In fact, the challenges we do face in the Texas electricity market today stem from too much—not too little—government intervention.

 

For instance, Texas has a “market monitor” that combines with the PUC’s regulatory efforts to severely hamper price competition in the wholesale market. It is funny—though not amusing—that at the same time the PUC is about to take over the market because prices are too low it is also suppressing prices through its existing regulatory efforts.

 

Additionally, state and federal subsidies for renewable energy are significantly distorting the market and decreasing the incentives for generators to build new plants.

 

Misguided regulation of ancillary markets and transmission congestion has also disrupted competition and reduced wholesale prices at the very time they needed to increase in order to resolve shortages.

 

There is no need to panic. Texas is not on the verge of running out of electricity. The problems we do have can be addressed by improving and reducing government intervention in the market.

 

At this point, however, this is not the path we are taking. And won’t be. Unless Texans contact their elected officials and the PUC’s chairman and commissioners to let them know that they do not want more regulation, higher prices, and higher taxes.

 

Surely, if Americans are making progress in turning back ObamaCare, Texans can do even better here by completely turning back Obama-style regulation of the Texas electricity market.

 

Bill

 

Click here to subscribe to Thinking Economically.

 

Bill Peacock
Vice President of Research

Director, Center for Economic Freedom

Texas Public Policy Foundation

bpeacock@texaspolicy.com

Tuesday, November 05, 2013

Thinking Economically: PUC Ready to Re-regulate Texas’ Electricity Market, and more

Musings on Economic Freedom from the Texas Public Policy Foundation’s

Center for Economic Freedom

 

PUC Ready to Re-regulate Texas’ Electricity Market

The discussion at the most recent PUC open meeting made it clear that a majority of the commissioners are ready to re-regulate Texas’ world-class electricity market, replacing competition with a capacity market fueled by a de facto electricity tax, collected though consumers’ bills, projected to run from $3 to $5 billion a year. The statements in support of a mandatory reserve margin will lead to a regulated system that takes decisions out of the hands of Texas consumers—and puts them into the hands of the PUC.

 

Rather than addressing Texas’ reliability concerns through a free and functioning market, the Lone Star State is instead moving toward a system of corporate subsidies and centralized control. This is the beginning of the end of the world’s most competitive electricity market and one of the great examples of deregulation in the United States. It sends an unfortunate signal that Texas is ready to run its electricity market much like Washington, D.C., is running our health care system.

Here’s our entire lineup on the Texas electricity market.

Farmers' Settlement Highlights Years of Excessive Homeowners Insurance Regulation

The proposed $117.5 million settlement between the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) and Farmers Insurance is a reminder of the problems caused by years of excessive regulation and litigation by TDI.

For instance, in  Geeslin v. State Farm Lloyds, the courts declared TDI’s actions void and unenforceable, finding the statute unconstitutional and that TDI had denied State Farm due process. In  TDI v. Allstate, TDI’s effort to make the company pay claims not included in its policies was found to be an unenforceable interference of the freedom to contract. Finally, in  TDI v. State Farm the courts declared a rate supervision order from TDI to be arbitrary and capricious. … continue reading

There and Back Again: The High Transition Costs of Electricity Regulation
Just as Texas consumers are beginning to see some slight relief from paying off the $9.5 billion price tag for transitioning to today’s competitive electricity market, the PUC is deliberating whether to add another $3 to $5 billion in annual payments in order to move back toward regulation. ... continue reading

PUC should make the right call

Any championship football coach can tell you that successfully converting a fourth and long does not depend on making a quick decision; it depends on making the right decision. Considering that a bad call could add upwards of $ 4 billion dollars per year to Texans’ electricity bills, the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) should heed that Sunday-night wisdom when deciding the fate of Texas’ competitive electricity market. … continue reading

A Capacity Market by Any Other Name Still Smells Like Big Government

The Public Utility Commission of Texas is now referring to a proposed capacity market as a reliability market. No doubt this name change is because capacity markets are getting a well-deserved bad name in Texas. For instance, in its first five years PJM’s capacity market cost consumers over $50 billion in capacity payments to generators. In Texas, the cost could reach $5 billion a year.

When the PUC commissioners vote to adopt a reliability market or a mandatory reserve margin, they will in fact be voting to adopt a capacity market. Calling a capacity market a reliability market won’t hide these facts. … continue reading

You Can't Make This Stuff Up

The city of Seattle is forcing a 103-year-old Spokane woman to sell her parking lot in Seattle to make way for, well, a parking lot. … continue reading

How to Reduce the Cost of Homeowners Insurance

A Texas state senator recently asked, “How might we offer something to consumers that at least gives them the opportunity, albeit for less coverage, to be able to pay less price” for homeowners insurance? That’s a good question.

There are two main ways to address this and reduce homeowners insurance prices in Texas. First, change the law to eliminate rate and content regulation.  Second, we have to reduce the excessive regulatory structure at TDI. … continue reading

Texas PolicyCast: A discussion on Competition in the Energy Market

Listen to our latest Texas Policycast discussing electricity regulation

Bill

Click here to subscribe to Thinking Economically.

Bill Peacock

Vice President of Research

Director, Center for Economic Freedom

Texas Public Policy Foundation

bpeacock@texaspolicy.com